Crotchety old professor slams GQ for categories of hot chicks

17 Jan

angry-old-woman

 

Yahoo! News – GQ just released their “The 100 Sexiest Women of the Millennium” issue featuring Beyonce on the cover as “Miss Millennium.” Flip through it and you’ll find the obvious nods to Jessica Simpson, Kim Kardashian, and Katie Holmes. But this year, the lad mag has included some ethnic specific categories that have some people raising their eyebrows. Examples: 

    •    “Hottest Indian Chick”: Freida Pinto
    •    “Hottest Pregnant Sri Lankan”: M.I.A
    •    “Hottest Italian Chick”: Monica Belluci
    •    “Hottest Chinese Chick”: Zhang Ziyi (sometimes credited as Ziyi Zhang) 

While there may not be anything inherently wrong with saying someone is a “Hot Chinese woman” the seemingly arbitrary racial call-outs have people squirming. For example, why did the magazine deem Beyonce “Miss Millennium” but not “Miss African-American Millennium?” Mila Kunis was included in the top three hottie picks but the magazine didn’t mention her Ukranian roots. And why was Kim Kardashian lauded for her performance in her 2007 sex tape but not labeled “Hottest Armenian Porn Star”? 

“If the magazine were saying, ‘These are all the beautiful women from every country in the world’, that would be a bit different; that’s what the Miss Universe pageant is all about,” says Ruth C. White, Ph.D., Associate Professor of Social Work in the Department of Anthropology, Sociology, and Social Work at Seattle University. “But by calling out certain women’s ethnicity and not others, what they’re implying is that these women are not beautiful simply because they’re beautiful; they’re only attractive within the context of their own ethnicity. This is qualifying their beauty and dismisses the idea that beauty comes in many different forms.”

Objectifying women in the media is an old song and dance. Studies have shown that women are more likely than men to get picked apart and seen as parts, rather than wholes. And it’s no surprise that men’s magazines sell so well in part because they feature women in racy, tantalizing photos. But reducing some women to tokens of their race (and curiously not others) others is a new low. 

Check out the full list of winners here. Is GQ being insensitive? 

No matter how old women are, they will never understand how the male brain works. It’s very simple, like middle school algebra: get to the lowest common denominator. LCD, sweetheart, get right to the point.

Anyways, I love the categories. If the chick is hot but not quite famous enough, boom she gets her own category to validate her appearance on this list. You throw some soccer player’s wife on there, American dudes are going to scratch their heads in Nebraska going, “I’ve never heard of her,” but you throw up there as “Hottest British Chick”, bingo bango they get it. Real simple here, ladies. This is how it works.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: